In Ackley, the claimant challenged the Utah Labor Commission’s (the Labor Commission) denial of her claim for worker’s compensation benefits, contending that the Labor Commission mis-applied the idiopathic fall doctrine in her claim.
In Ackley, the claimant challenged the Utah Labor Commission’s (the Labor Commission) denial of her claim for worker’s compensation benefits, contending that the Labor Commission mis-applied the idiopathic fall doctrine in her claim.
In Dery, the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (the Panel) affirmed the decision of the ALJ to deny housekeeping services as a medical benefit.
In Atencio, the Colorado Court of Appeals (the Court) held that respondents were not required to reopen claimant’s case after filing their final admission of liability to recoup an overpayment.
The Colorado Court of Appeals (the Court) determined in Peitz, as a matter of first impression, that Rule 11-5 of the Workers’ Compensation Rules of Procedure (WCRP) does not prohibit a physician performing a DIME from evaluating all aspects of a worker’s injury in determining whether the worker has obtained maximum medical improvement (“MMI”).